Devaluing Housing Commodities

Work thumb

Views: 50

  • Title: Devaluing Housing Commodities: A Systematic Literature Review of the Housing Activist Community Movement and Structural Obstacles to Achieving Affordable Housing
  • Author(s): Septia Faril Lukman , Joko Adianto
  • Publisher: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Collection: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Series: Design Principles & Practices
  • Journal Title: The International Journal of Design in Society
  • Keywords: Affordable Housing, Housing Communities, Community Land Trusts, Use-Value Vs. Exchange Value, Housing Commodification, Alternative Housing Finance, Grassroots Participation, Social Sustainability
  • Volume: 20
  • Issue: 1
  • Date: October 28, 2025
  • ISSN: 2325-1328 (Print)
  • ISSN: 2325-1360 (Online)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1328/CGP/v20i01/209-229
  • Citation: Lukman, Septia Faril, and Joko Adianto. 2025. "Devaluing Housing Commodities: A Systematic Literature Review of the Housing Activist Community Movement and Structural Obstacles to Achieving Affordable Housing." The International Journal of Design in Society 20 (1): 209-229. doi:10.18848/2325-1328/CGP/v20i01/209-229.
  • Extent: 21 pages

All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2025, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved

Abstract

Within the global capitalist system, housing has been profoundly reconfigured from a fundamental human need (use-value) into a speculative commodity governed by the logic of exchange value. This transformation has exacerbated inequalities in homeownership and severely restricted access to adequate shelter for low-income populations. Amidst this crisis, housing activist communities have emerged as counter-hegemonic actors, rejecting the commodification of shelter and reclaiming housing as a social right anchored in use-value. This study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of thirty-four international peer-reviewed journals to investigate the research question: How do housing activist communities facilitate the provision of affordable, use-value-based housing under a capitalist regime dominated by exchange value? Findings indicate that these communities play a critical role in delivering affordable housing through innovative models such as Community Land Trusts (CLTs), community-led development (CLD), co-housing, self-help housing, group-build initiatives, and service-supported social interventions. Their contribution extends beyond the physical production of dwellings; they foster inclusive, participatory, and sustainable social structures. These communities establish collective governance mechanisms that center social solidarity and economic sustainability. Nonetheless, the movement faces profound challenges, including managerial capacity constraints, state co-optation, resource scarcity, neoliberal encroachment, profit-driven partnerships, and dilemmas of scalability. This review urges scholars, urban planners, and policymakers not merely to support but to learn from these communities as living laboratories in which just urban futures are actively being contested and co-created. The expansion and replication of housing activist models require deep sensitivity to local contexts and the meaningful participation of residents.