Produced with Scholar

Project: Learning Module

Project Overview

Icon for ACTING 101: Asynchronous Remote (Revision 5/25)

ACTING 101: Asynchronous Remote (Revision 5/25)

 

Learning Module- Acting 101 (Remote; Asynchronous):

Beginner's Acting Technique for the Independent Learner

Learning Module History

Though I have extensive experience with creating learning modules for other courses, this module will be brand new and made from scratch. I have experience teaching acting at both the secondary and higher education level, though usually supplementary to my experience teaching composition. I taught an acting course for non-majors at the collegiate level in the Spring of 2020. I came in at the third week, taking over for the full time instructor who went on maternity leave. Like all educational modes in this time period, we were forced to go remote due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Like many educators at any level, this forced me to rethink the efficacy of teaching something as experiential as acting through compromised, remote modes. It puts much more focus on acting with the face and voice (rather than the whole body.) It also enables more emphasis on text analysis as well as some minimal experimentation with on-camera acting (framing, subtly, etc.) This inspired me to design a curriculum for remote asynchronous acting classes for majors, with the primary goal that would not be a compromise. The training would be effective and rigorous even though traditionally this craft is reliant on constant interaction. The course would be primarily centered around the concept of mimesis, where students learn from mimicking the performances and behaviors of others as well as analysis of personal recordings of their own performances.

 

Objectives/Standards

1. Target Learners:

This is a first year collegiate acting course for majors. This course caters to those who have already had past experience with acting, but are new to formal training. Prior experience can include acting in school, community, or professional plays/musicals, appearing in short or feature films, television programs or commercials, participating in interactive immersive experiences such as amusement parks or role playing at holiday parties, etc. Students without any experience could consider taking the class, but be prepared to be measured up to the same standards of those more experienced students. Students should be committed to continuing and building their craft beyond this course and pursuing a career as a professional actor.

2. Curriculum Standards:

Higher Order Thinking

Analysis of a character or story’s narrative is necessary to create complex, nuanced performances that will truly move audiences.

Text Memorization

A pragmatic and practical skill, memorization is almost always a requirement of most performances, save for voice overs. The more a student practices at it, the easier it will become.

Text Analysis

Once again, understanding the given circumstances of a narrative/piece as well as the temporal situation surrounding its creation will help students make unique acting choices that will set them apart.

Refined Revision and Adjustment

Acting is a trial and error process, and actors will usually receive some sort of direction from a director to make adjustments to their performances. The ability to take direction, be open to changes, and to MAKE changes are essential components of being a professional actor.

Growth Mindset

No one actor is perfect, and certainly no one student is. The purpose of an acting class is to train the student to evolve as an actor, providing techniques that will make their quality consistent. Even if a student is already performing well, they should always strive for improvement.

Emotional Accessibility and Availability

Acting quite frankly is about feeling, and tapping into emotions that create interesting behavior and characters that can move an audience. Though it may be out of a student’s comfort zone, this class will require them to move beyond intellectual cognition to explore emotional expression whether from working inside-out or outside-in.

Access to recording technology

The ever evolving acting profession requires more than just a headshot these days. Audition submissions are becoming more and more remote as the ages go on. Students will need to become more comfortable perfecting the skills of recording themselves, sending files, adjusting to camera, etc.

Connection with an assigned partner

Though asynchronous education fosters independence above most else, acting is rarely done in a bubble. Scene work will be an essential part of this class, as actors need to be able to listen, observe, and respond to a fellow actor/character as that yields interesting, organic behavior.

3. Learning Outcomes:

Students will. . .

Analyze texts to aid them in making unique but appropriate performance choices. This analysis will also stimulate their critical thinking.

Engage in a recursive process of mimesis, where students will actively study recordings of other interpretations of their assigned role as well as recordings of themselves.

Create unique interpretations that evolve from the mimetic process.

Read required acting instructional texts (Stanislavski, Hagen, Meisner, etc.) and compose formal reflections on the technique and how they plan to use it.

Build vocal, speech, and physical abilities as instruments of performance.

Actively rehearse assigned monologues/scenes before the final presentation is recorded and uploaded.

Connect with an assigned partner to rehearse scenes remotely before the final product is recorded and uploaded. Even though this is an asynchronous course, working with another person is a necessity for most acting opportunities, and students will actively practice the tenet of “listen, observe, and respond.”

4. Anticipated duration to complete the module

12 weeks

5. Material requirements.

Respect for Acting- Uta Hagen

Sanford Meisner on Acting- Sanford Meisner and Dennis Longwell

An Actor Prepares- Constantin Stanislavski

Improvisation for the Theater- Viola Spolin

Access to the internet and webcam with recording capabilities, preferably a laptop or desktop computer. Phone or tablet access is not recommended.

Metaquest VR simulator with the Ovation application

https://www.ovationvr.com/
 

6. Assessment Breakdown:

 

  • Scene Work- 50%
  • Video/Reading Response- 20%
  • Discussion Post/Peer Review- 30%

 

Scene Work will be evaluated using the following criteria:

Total Grade:

30% - Memorization/Preparedness:

  • Student has followed every step and direction outlined in the prompt.
  • Student has memorized the text, if need be.
  • Student has presented the material with a clean, blank background with no distracting clutter.

25%- Emotional Commitment

  • Student commits to the emotional stakes of the material.
  • Student expresses a variety of nuanced emotions as opposed to just one to which they are comfortable.
  • Student allows themself to be vulnerable.

25%- Making Active Choices

  • Unless otherwise stated, student does not perform text blankly but makes a choice that matters to the character with high stakes.
  • Student experiments with different choices and is open to trying new tactics after feedback.

20%- Clarity/Presence

  • Student can be heard and seen clearly on screen.
  • Student is not multitasking while recording video and is focused entirely on the assignment.
  • Student uses proper diction when speaking and can be understood.
  • Student’s face and at least half of their body can be seen on screen.

 

 

Video responses, discussion posts, and peer reviews will be evaluated using the following criteria:

Total Grade:

20%- Spelling/Mechanics

  • Writing is error free with few grammatical or spelling errors.

80%- Critical Thinking

  • Student makes thoughtful reflections about their work or their fellow students’ work.
  • Rather than just labeling, student thoroughly explains why they have come to their respective conclusions and support their answers with evidence/details.
  • Student uses at least five complete sentences per post.

 

7.  Synchronous Meetings

Every Friday from 3pm-5pm, the instructor will hold a live Q and A session about the course and will review any material at the students’ requests.

This time frame will also be designated for opportunities for live feedback to run scenes and monologues for the instructor and fellow students. This is an invaluable opportunity for extra enhancement, and is strongly encouraged.

If a student is unable to attend these optional events, they are welcome to contact their instructor to set up an alternative time to meet at their discretion.

There will also be four mandatory peer lead discussion groups at the end of weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12. These sessions will operate as round robins, discussing process with possible opportunities to share work for extra feedback. These sessions will be recorded and uploaded to the learning management system.

Week 1

Update #1- I’m Talking to the Man in the Mirror You are Talking to the Man in the Mirror (Student)

 

Media embedded May 22, 2025

Readings/Reflection

Read Chapter Two of Sanford Meisner on Acting: “Building a Foundation: The Reality of Doing.”

https://archive.org/details/SanfordMeisnerOnActing/page/n23/mode/2up


In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):

  • According to Meisner, what is the difference between mechanical repetition and repetition from one’s own point of view? Why might it be important to start with mechanical repetition?
  • Why does Meisner object to “creating variety” in the repetition exercise? Do you agree or disagree? Why?
  • There is much pressure in the industry for actors to be real and/or natural. Meisner often refers to the repetition exercise as “inhuman” and “mechanical”. He also claims it is the “basis for something.” What do you think it is the basis for? Will it eventually make performances “more real”? Does that matter?
  • This chapter is not written like a traditional textbook nor manual. It appears to be an objective transcript of one of Meisner’s classes. Why do you think Meisner and Longwell chose to present the material this way? Why might it be an appropriate parallel to the exercise itself?
  • Pick a role from a play that either you have already played or that you would like to play at some point in the future. How might this exercise be beneficial in finding these characters or developing your performance?

Video

Watch the video Sanford Meisner Master Class Screener.

Media embedded May 22, 2025


 

In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions:

  • What moments seemed organic between the students during the repetition exercise?
  • What moments seemed forced or contrived? Explain your answers. (250-300 words)

Diagram


 

Scene Work

With your assigned partner, complete the repetition exercise twice. You may meet in person and record your exercises in front of a camera, or you may meet remotely on Zoom or Teams and record your meeting.

The first time you attempt the exercise, start with just mechanical repetition. Avoid switching up inflections and emotions arbitrarily for variety. Let the exercise play out for five minutes WITHOUT STOPPING.

The second time you attempt the exercise, approach it from your point of view. While the focus should still be on repetition, you can let the observations evolve and change but do NOT force it. Let the exercise play out for five minutes.

Upload both of these videos to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of both of these recordings as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective. What was an interesting behavior that you observed?

Respond to the recording of two other classmates using the rubric attached below

Scene_20Work_20Peer_20Review.pdf

. (200-250 words)

Update #1- I’m Talking to the Man in the Mirror You are Talking to the Man in the Mirror (Teacher)

Video/Reflection

A perfect way to model the Meisner technique is by showing a video of two or more students enacting the repetition exercise. A mere description would be too abstract. The response prompt gives students an incentive to watch and scrutinize the video, learning the technique through observation and its value through analysis.

Once again, these responses should be evaluated holistically based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity. Similarly, the worth of these study questions should be at the instructor’s discretion but worth less than peer reviews and scene work.

 

Scene Work/Reflection

 

While this class is mostly designed to be self-sufficient and asynchronous, this is one of the few exercises that requires students to work with a partner. However, the responsibility of organizing a time to meet is up to them, once again encouraging some independence.

Furthermore, a major theme of this class is mimesis and learning performance techniques through mimicry and observation. Recording the activities then watching them gives the student an opportunity to evaluate themselves objectively. This also gives them a basis of comparison with how their peers and instructor responds.

Responding to other classmates’ recordings also gives the student an opportunity to learn from them as they provide another model of how the exercise is done. Sometimes it is easier to identify an issue in someone else’s activity than your own. Therefore, picking this issue out in someone else’s performance could help the student better identify it in themselves.

The instructor should also provide thorough feedback for the recordings, and encourage students to compare the reflections from all three evaluators: teacher, peers, and themselves.

To better assimilate a classroom environment, the instructor might want to record a video of their feedback as if they were giving it in a live, in person setting. This would also break up the monotony of producing excessive text.

Post Left-Side Content to a Community

Week 2

Update #2- A Little Less Conversation, A LOT More Action.(Student)

 

Media embedded May 22, 2025

Readings/Reflection

Read Chapter Three of An Actor Prepares by Konstantin Stanislavski: “Action”

https://archive.org/details/2015.126189.AnActorPrepares/page/33/mode/2up


In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):

  • What are key similarities between this text and the Sanford Meisner chapter “The Reality of Doing”? Key differences?
  • What do you think was the purpose of the “Pin Search” exercise that Maria enacted? Why is it so important to “do” rather than “act?” How can these motivations and techniques be applied without a doable action on stage/screen (ala murder, dying, telekinesis, etc.)?
  • According to the Director in this chapter, what is the intrinsic value of the “if”? How does the “if” relate to the “given circumstances”? Should the “if” and the “given circumstances” always be considered when preparing for a role?
  • This book is written from the gaze of a fictional character writing a contrived diary. Why do you think Stanislavski chose to present his methods this way? For a method that is obsessed with realism and organic behavior, does this fictional presentation cheapen the method in any way? Why or why not?

 

Video


Watch the film Jeanne Dielman 23 Quai Du Commerce 1080 Bruxelles

 

https://archive.org/details/jean.-dielman.-23.-quai.du.-commerce.-1975
 

The film is quite long, so, though I recommend watching the entire film (it is a masterpiece and you can learn a lot from it), at minimum watch the first 45 minutes and the last 45 minutes.

In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to this chapter using the following questions.

  • Pick three sequences in the film with Jeanne on screen by herself, using relative stillness. What emotions and intentions does the actress Delphine Seyrig convey in these minimal moments?
  • Describe every nuance of her movements, sounds, expressions, etc. In your words, what do they communicate?

Diagram


Scene Work

Pick one scene of relative stillness in Jeanne Dielman. . .

As you watch, mirror all of her movements and gestures to the best of your ability. Do not embellish nor exaggerate.

Record yourself performing a replica of this performance. You may film yourself mirroring the performance with the screen out of sight or perform it from memory after copious rehearsals.Upload the recording to the message board.

In a new recording, improvise a monologue based on what you imagine the character from your last recording was thinking/feeling. Avoid any formal scripting, and speak from the heart in the moment. To the best of your ability, recreate this impromptu monologue on Ovation through Metaquest VR. This virtual reality simulator will help you gauge audience response and will evaluate you on any distracting speaking habits.

Upload all of these videos to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of both of these recordings as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective.

Respond to the recording of two other classmates. (200-250 words)

Scene_20Work_20Peer_20Review.pdf

Update #2- A Little Less Conversation, A LOT More Action (Teachers)

Readings/Reflection

The approach to all the readings and reflections will be fairly universal. Once again, the instructor should evaluate the writing based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity.

This chapter focuses on the importance of “doing” rather than “acting”. This could also test the patience of a young actor as stillness and listening seems like “doing nothing” to them. Putting these qualities into context before the students experiment with them could help them develop a deeper appreciation and respect for them, especially since they are being modeled, albeit in text descriptions.

Video/Reflection

This will likely be the longest video the students watch on their own. This is an exemplary example of a performance relying on the principles of “doing” and “stillness.” Here, Delphine Seyrig employs these moments not as a means to an end, but as a basis for a fully developed, nuanced performance. Studying and scrutinizing this performance will give the students an idea of just how powerful these seemingly passive actions can be.

Scene Work/Reflection

This exercise is a variation of the mirror exercise, where students imitate the movements of another student standing before them. It establishes a point of concentration and an opportunity to respond to the actions of someone. In person, the mirror exercise can be invaluable to establish a connection with a partner as the point is that the two students are both intuitively moving together without one or the other fully initiating.

This exercise working with Jeanne Dielman. . . focuses on the point of concentration rather than partner connection. However, it is also an opportunity to work specifically with mimesis. In arbitrarily replicating Seyrig’s physicality, students will be free to make their own discoveries and allow their approach to the same movements to morph into something more unique.

Therefore, instructors should not grade these activities on the accuracy of the mimesis, but instead on commitment and focus. The reflection element of this assignment is a valuable opportunity for the students to make further discoveries from an objective perspective, as insights are not always apparent when acting from moment to moment.

 

Post Left-Side Content to a Community

Week 3

Update #3- Sitting by Myself. Talking to Myself. CHAOS THEORY! (Student)

"You talkin' to me?"

Read Chapter Sixteen “Talking to Yourself” from Respect for Acting by Uta Hagen

https://archive.org/details/respect-for-acting/page/120/mode/2up

 

In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):

  • What does Hagen mean when she says that talking to oneself is to “gain control over circumstances”? Describe a time when either you or someone you witnessed displayed this kind of self talk. Was it productive? Why or why not?
  • How does Hagen describe the “fantasy talking aloud”? When you ever did this yourself, what do you think the purpose of this self-talk was in hindsight?
  • What does Hagen insist that the actor consider in addition to the words and text when talking to oneself? Why is this a necessary step?
  • Unlike the Meisner and Stanislavski texts, Respect for Acting is written in a more straightforward essay format rather than an anecdotal account of a real acting class. Is this approach more or less effective than the previous anecdotal texts? Why or why not?

Video

Watch the video "Talking to Yourself"

 

Media embedded May 23, 2025


 

In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions:

  • What moments seemed organic in the “Talking to Yourself” exercise with the young woman? What moments seemed forced or contrived? Explain your answers. (250-300 words)

Scene Work

Record yourself making a grocery list out loud. Try to verbalize every thought that goes through your head during this activity, and do not write anything down. Organizing these details in your head and then aloud will make this exercise more focused and active. Keep the self talk going for two straight minutes. Watch the recording, and take notes of what you observe. Record the exercise again, but this time mirroring your every move and word from your first round.

Upload the most recent recording to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of this recording as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective.

Respond to the recording of two other classmates. (200-250 words)

Scene_20Work_20Peer_20Review.pdf

 

Post Student Content to a Community

Update #3- Sitting by Myself. Talking to Myself. CHAOS THEORY! (Teachers)

 

Readings/Reflection

The approach to all the readings and reflections will be fairly universal. Once again, the instructor should evaluate the writing based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity.

This chapter defends a practice that often seems artificial and inorganic on stage and screen: talking to oneself.

However, like anything, this action only seems phony when it is particularly amplified or contrived for effect. Also, talking to oneself on stage/screen is often the sign of lazy writing when a character launches into a tirade whose sole purpose is to provide exposition. When performed organically, self talk can be a useful tool for an actor.

The responses here require some introspection in addition to references to the text, asking the students to recall these times they verbalize to themselves and analyze what made them do so in the first place.

Video

The video for this update models an acting exercise where an actress talks to herself in character as she searches for cats while also agonizing over the mess they have made. This features footage of Uta Hagen herself actively explaining this concept to a student.

Much like the Meisner technique video from the Update #1, this video asks students to denote both the organic and contrived moments in the exercise. This will help students realize what actions they should try to avoid and identify the kind of moments that work for this type of exercise. Modeling is in a way a form of mimesis because it portrays a template that can be followed beat by beat at first until the piece evolves into something more unique.

Scene Work

This activity provides a point of focus as the student is tasked with actively making a list. This also incorporates mimesis as it tasks the student to repeat a performance that started as improvisational and organic. For formal productions, actors must be able to recreate moments and continue to make them appear and feel organic, even if they are contrived in reality. This also allows the actor to trust that the physicality of the moment will trigger the inner life of a character once the initial blocking has been set.

If the student uploads both of these recordings, they then can be compared and contrasted to identify anything lost or gained from the initial exercise to the encore.

The instructor and peer reviewers should be constantly looking for these small nuances and details in these recordings, especially since there will be closer shots of students’ faces and the luxury of recording that can be paused and rewound.

Post Student Content to a Community

Week 4

Update #4- Start Playing Games with Your Heart (Student)

Scene_20Work_20Peer_20Review.pdf

Readings/Reflection 

Read the chapter “I. Creative Experience“ from Improvisation for the Actor by Viola Spolin

https://archive.org/details/improvisationfor0000spol_l6g0/page/2/mode/2up?view=theater

In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):

  • How does Spolin express the importance of games in actor education experience? How can you as an acting student incorporate games and their fundamentals effectively in this limiting asynchronous model?
  • What is Spolin’s view on the actor’s need for approval and fear of disapproval? Describe the advantages and disadvantages about the access (or lack thereof) to approval/disapproval in the asynchronous education model.
  • According to Spolin, what is the difference between “imposed competition” and “natural competition?” How would an acting student create an environment for “natural competition” in an asynchronous model?
  • What argument does Spolin make for the necessity of the audience in performance? Do you think this applies to on camera acting as well? Describe the advantages and disadvantages of working mostly without an audience in the asynchronous model.
  • Describe Spolin’s view on the importance of physicality in performance. How can you incorporate physicality effectively when acting a scene on Zoom or other streaming platforms?

Video

Watch the Video:

"Theatre Game #11 XL- Alan Sells Apples In Albania." From Drama Menu - drama games & ideas for drama.

Media embedded May 23, 2025

In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions:

  • How would you adapt this theater game so that it could be done solo? If possible, try to demonstrate this in a video that you can upload to the message board. (250-300 words)
  • For those who decide to come to the next live Q and A, we will start by playing a game of “Zip-Zap-Zop.” This game typically takes place in person and it involves eye contact with another person in a circle. Please come to the session with ideas of how to adapt the game for a reote Zoom session, as so much of acting is taking a pre-existing text and adapting it to one's interpretation.
  • Just a refresher of the rules: One person starts by yelling “Zip”, making a clap forward gesture, and making clear eye contact with someone else in the circle. The person to whom this “Zip” was directed would then do the same call and gesture but yell “Zap” instead of “Zip”. The next person would repeat these steps but yell “Zop” instead. This repeats until someone is too slow or makes an error.

For further reference, watch the video below demonstrating how the game is executed in person.

Media embedded May 23, 2025

Scene Work

Much like the card game solitaire, develop your own theater game that can be played by just one person at a time.

Record yourself explaining the rules of this game and then demonstrating it. Then, explain how this game could be amended to include TWO people. Let a classmate enter your Zoom room, and demonstrate the game.

Upload this recording to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of this recording as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective.

Respond to the recording of two other classmates. (200-250 words)

Scene_20Work_20Peer_20Review.pdf

 

Update #4- Start Playing Games with Your Heart (Teacher)

 

Readings/Reflection

The approach to all the readings and reflections will be fairly universal. Once again, the instructor should evaluate the writing based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity.

This chapter is a more formally written informative text that discusses the necessity of games, teamwork, and working with an audience. In the reflection questions, students should focus most on adaptability and how they can utilize these tenets by themselves in their own insular bubble. This kind of reflection can lead directly into the Scene Work that tasks them to create their own solitary theatre game.


Video/Response

There is a specific way that this activity can be adapted into a solo activity: an actor can look at a random letter generator, whether it is on their phone or with flash cards. They then can give a new answer with each successive letter, timing themselves to keep on pace. For example, they might flash to a “G” and say “Greg sells Grapes in Greenland” then quickly flash to J and say “John sells jam in Johannesburg.” This maintains the quick thinking, under pressure element of the game without someone randomly pointing at the actor.

However, this A solution, but not THE solution. The instructor could offer this solution if a student is stubborn and insistent that there is no way to amend the theatre game. The instructor should be open to whatever amendments the student suggests. That being said, these amendments should be feasible and within the purview of an average middle class person. For example, generating hologram AI’s to join the student in a circle would NOT be feasible nor within the average student’s purview.

Scene Work

This update requires the student to develop TWO self sufficient theater games. However, the original game will be reverse engineered to include multiple people.

This will give students the opportunity to flex their skills as a practitioner or director as they will need to explain their process both to the audience of the video and to their partner from class.

Instructors should evaluate this scene work based on the originality of their idea, the clarity in which they explain and demonstrate it, and how useful the game will be in their development as actors.

Post Left-Side Content to a Community

Week 5 Evaluation

Update #5- Class Evaluation (Student)

 

Complete the class evaluation at the link below:

Acting 101: Course Evaluation

https://forms.gle/AyNFQ6217X5ouEcN9

These surveys will be completed anonymously, so your complete transparency and discretion is appreciate

Update #5- Class Evaluation (Teacher)

 


Acting 101 (Asynchronous) Class Evaluation



How rewarding were the solitary asynchronous elements of this class?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding


How rewarding were any projects involving partners, groups, peer review, etc?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding


How satisfactory was the feedback you received from your instructor on assignments and projects?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding


How satisfactory was the feedback you received from your peers on assignments and projects?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding


Was this remote/asynchronous class model an adequate substitute for the synchronous, face-to-face model?

  • Inadequate. I regret taking this course.
  • Inadequate, but still useful in some ways.
  • Adequate. I learned what I needed.
  • More Than Adequate. I learned more than I expected.
  • Even Better Than Adequate. I feel like I learned more from this model than I would have in person.


Would you prefer more or less group/partner activities?

  • More Group Activities
  • The Same Amount
  • Fewer Group Activities
  • No Group Activities at All


Did acting exclusively on Zoom/Teams feel limiting?

  • Extremely Limiting
  • Limiting
  • Somewhat Limiting
  • Not Limiting at All


Post Left-Side Content to a Community