Learning Module- Acting 101 (Remote; Asynchronous):
Beginner's Acting Technique for the Independent Learner
Learning Module History
Though I have extensive experience with creating learning modules for other courses, this module will be brand new and made from scratch. I have experience teaching acting at both the secondary and higher education level, though usually supplementary to my experience teaching composition. I taught an acting course for non-majors at the collegiate level in the Spring of 2020. I came in at the third week, taking over for the full time instructor who went on maternity leave. Like all educational modes in this time period, we were forced to go remote due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Like many educators at any level, this forced me to rethink the efficacy of teaching something as experiential as acting through compromised, remote modes. It puts much more focus on acting with the face and voice (rather than the whole body.) It also enables more emphasis on text analysis as well as some minimal experimentation with on-camera acting (framing, subtly, etc.) This inspired me to design a curriculum for remote asynchronous acting classes for majors, with the primary goal that would not be a compromise. The training would be effective and rigorous even though traditionally this craft is reliant on constant interaction. The course would be primarily centered around the concept of mimesis, where students learn from mimicking the performances and behaviors of others as well as analysis of personal recordings of their own performances.
Objectives/Standards
1. Target Learners:
This is a first year collegiate acting course for majors. This course caters to those who have already had past experience with acting, but are new to formal training. Prior experience can include acting in school, community, or professional plays/musicals, appearing in short or feature films, television programs or commercials, participating in interactive immersive experiences such as amusement parks or role playing at holiday parties, etc. Students without any experience could consider taking the class, but be prepared to be measured up to the same standards of those more experienced students. Students should be committed to continuing and building their craft beyond this course and pursuing a career as a professional actor.
2. Curriculum Standards:
Higher Order Thinking
Analysis of a character or story’s narrative is necessary to create complex, nuanced performances that will truly move audiences.
Text Memorization
A pragmatic and practical skill, memorization is almost always a requirement of most performances, save for voice overs. The more a student practices at it, the easier it will become.
Text Analysis
Once again, understanding the given circumstances of a narrative/piece as well as the temporal situation surrounding its creation will help students make unique acting choices that will set them apart.
Refined Revision and Adjustment
Acting is a trial and error process, and actors will usually receive some sort of direction from a director to make adjustments to their performances. The ability to take direction, be open to changes, and to MAKE changes are essential components of being a professional actor.
Growth Mindset
No one actor is perfect, and certainly no one student is. The purpose of an acting class is to train the student to evolve as an actor, providing techniques that will make their quality consistent. Even if a student is already performing well, they should always strive for improvement.
Emotional Accessibility and Availability
Acting quite frankly is about feeling, and tapping into emotions that create interesting behavior and characters that can move an audience. Though it may be out of a student’s comfort zone, this class will require them to move beyond intellectual cognition to explore emotional expression whether from working inside-out or outside-in.
Access to recording technology
The ever evolving acting profession requires more than just a headshot these days. Audition submissions are becoming more and more remote as the ages go on. Students will need to become more comfortable perfecting the skills of recording themselves, sending files, adjusting to camera, etc.
Connection with an assigned partner
Though asynchronous education fosters independence above most else, acting is rarely done in a bubble. Scene work will be an essential part of this class, as actors need to be able to listen, observe, and respond to a fellow actor/character as that yields interesting, organic behavior.
3. Learning Outcomes:
Students will. . .
Analyze texts to aid them in making unique but appropriate performance choices. This analysis will also stimulate their critical thinking.
Engage in a recursive process of mimesis, where students will actively study recordings of other interpretations of their assigned role as well as recordings of themselves.
Create unique interpretations that evolve from the mimetic process.
Read required acting instructional texts (Stanislavski, Hagen, Meisner, etc.) and compose formal reflections on the technique and how they plan to use it.
Build vocal, speech, and physical abilities as instruments of performance.
Actively rehearse assigned monologues/scenes before the final presentation is recorded and uploaded.
Connect with an assigned partner to rehearse scenes remotely before the final product is recorded and uploaded. Even though this is an asynchronous course, working with another person is a necessity for most acting opportunities, and students will actively practice the tenet of “listen, observe, and respond.”
4. Anticipated duration to complete the module
12 weeks
5. Material requirements.
Respect for Acting- Uta Hagen
Sanford Meisner on Acting- Sanford Meisner and Dennis Longwell
An Actor Prepares- Constantin Stanislavski
Improvisation for the Theater- Viola Spolin
Access to the internet and webcam with recording capabilities, preferably a laptop or desktop computer. Phone or tablet access is not recommended.
Metaquest VR simulator with the Ovation application
6. Assessment Breakdown:
Scene Work will be evaluated using the following criteria:
Total Grade:
30% - Memorization/Preparedness:
25%- Emotional Commitment
25%- Making Active Choices
20%- Clarity/Presence
Video responses, discussion posts, and peer reviews will be evaluated using the following criteria:
Total Grade:
20%- Spelling/Mechanics
80%- Critical Thinking
7. Synchronous Meetings
Every Friday from 3pm-5pm, the instructor will hold a live Q and A session about the course and will review any material at the students’ requests.
This time frame will also be designated for opportunities for live feedback to run scenes and monologues for the instructor and fellow students. This is an invaluable opportunity for extra enhancement, and is strongly encouraged.
If a student is unable to attend these optional events, they are welcome to contact their instructor to set up an alternative time to meet at their discretion.
There will also be four mandatory peer lead discussion groups at the end of weeks 3, 6, 9, and 12. These sessions will operate as round robins, discussing process with possible opportunities to share work for extra feedback. These sessions will be recorded and uploaded to the learning management system.
Readings/Reflection
Read Chapter Two of Sanford Meisner on Acting: “Building a Foundation: The Reality of Doing.”
https://archive.org/details/SanfordMeisnerOnActing/page/n23/mode/2up
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):
Video
Watch the video Sanford Meisner Master Class Screener.
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions:
Diagram
Scene Work
With your assigned partner, complete the repetition exercise twice. You may meet in person and record your exercises in front of a camera, or you may meet remotely on Zoom or Teams and record your meeting.
The first time you attempt the exercise, start with just mechanical repetition. Avoid switching up inflections and emotions arbitrarily for variety. Let the exercise play out for five minutes WITHOUT STOPPING.
The second time you attempt the exercise, approach it from your point of view. While the focus should still be on repetition, you can let the observations evolve and change but do NOT force it. Let the exercise play out for five minutes.
Upload both of these videos to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of both of these recordings as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective. What was an interesting behavior that you observed?
Respond to the recording of two other classmates using the rubric attached below
. (200-250 words)
Video/Reflection
A perfect way to model the Meisner technique is by showing a video of two or more students enacting the repetition exercise. A mere description would be too abstract. The response prompt gives students an incentive to watch and scrutinize the video, learning the technique through observation and its value through analysis.
Once again, these responses should be evaluated holistically based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity. Similarly, the worth of these study questions should be at the instructor’s discretion but worth less than peer reviews and scene work.
Scene Work/Reflection
While this class is mostly designed to be self-sufficient and asynchronous, this is one of the few exercises that requires students to work with a partner. However, the responsibility of organizing a time to meet is up to them, once again encouraging some independence.
Furthermore, a major theme of this class is mimesis and learning performance techniques through mimicry and observation. Recording the activities then watching them gives the student an opportunity to evaluate themselves objectively. This also gives them a basis of comparison with how their peers and instructor responds.
Responding to other classmates’ recordings also gives the student an opportunity to learn from them as they provide another model of how the exercise is done. Sometimes it is easier to identify an issue in someone else’s activity than your own. Therefore, picking this issue out in someone else’s performance could help the student better identify it in themselves.
The instructor should also provide thorough feedback for the recordings, and encourage students to compare the reflections from all three evaluators: teacher, peers, and themselves.
To better assimilate a classroom environment, the instructor might want to record a video of their feedback as if they were giving it in a live, in person setting. This would also break up the monotony of producing excessive text.
Readings/Reflection
Read Chapter Three of An Actor Prepares by Konstantin Stanislavski: “Action”
https://archive.org/details/2015.126189.AnActorPrepares/page/33/mode/2up
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):
Video
Watch the film Jeanne Dielman 23 Quai Du Commerce 1080 Bruxelles
https://archive.org/details/jean.-dielman.-23.-quai.du.-commerce.-1975
The film is quite long, so, though I recommend watching the entire film (it is a masterpiece and you can learn a lot from it), at minimum watch the first 45 minutes and the last 45 minutes.
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to this chapter using the following questions.
Diagram
Scene Work
Pick one scene of relative stillness in Jeanne Dielman. . .
As you watch, mirror all of her movements and gestures to the best of your ability. Do not embellish nor exaggerate.
Record yourself performing a replica of this performance. You may film yourself mirroring the performance with the screen out of sight or perform it from memory after copious rehearsals.Upload the recording to the message board.
In a new recording, improvise a monologue based on what you imagine the character from your last recording was thinking/feeling. Avoid any formal scripting, and speak from the heart in the moment. To the best of your ability, recreate this impromptu monologue on Ovation through Metaquest VR. This virtual reality simulator will help you gauge audience response and will evaluate you on any distracting speaking habits.
Upload all of these videos to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of both of these recordings as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective.
Respond to the recording of two other classmates. (200-250 words)
Readings/Reflection
The approach to all the readings and reflections will be fairly universal. Once again, the instructor should evaluate the writing based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity.
This chapter focuses on the importance of “doing” rather than “acting”. This could also test the patience of a young actor as stillness and listening seems like “doing nothing” to them. Putting these qualities into context before the students experiment with them could help them develop a deeper appreciation and respect for them, especially since they are being modeled, albeit in text descriptions.
Video/Reflection
This will likely be the longest video the students watch on their own. This is an exemplary example of a performance relying on the principles of “doing” and “stillness.” Here, Delphine Seyrig employs these moments not as a means to an end, but as a basis for a fully developed, nuanced performance. Studying and scrutinizing this performance will give the students an idea of just how powerful these seemingly passive actions can be.
Scene Work/Reflection
This exercise is a variation of the mirror exercise, where students imitate the movements of another student standing before them. It establishes a point of concentration and an opportunity to respond to the actions of someone. In person, the mirror exercise can be invaluable to establish a connection with a partner as the point is that the two students are both intuitively moving together without one or the other fully initiating.
This exercise working with Jeanne Dielman. . . focuses on the point of concentration rather than partner connection. However, it is also an opportunity to work specifically with mimesis. In arbitrarily replicating Seyrig’s physicality, students will be free to make their own discoveries and allow their approach to the same movements to morph into something more unique.
Therefore, instructors should not grade these activities on the accuracy of the mimesis, but instead on commitment and focus. The reflection element of this assignment is a valuable opportunity for the students to make further discoveries from an objective perspective, as insights are not always apparent when acting from moment to moment.
Read Chapter Sixteen “Talking to Yourself” from Respect for Acting by Uta Hagen
https://archive.org/details/respect-for-acting/page/120/mode/2up
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):
Video
Watch the video "Talking to Yourself"
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions:
Scene Work
Record yourself making a grocery list out loud. Try to verbalize every thought that goes through your head during this activity, and do not write anything down. Organizing these details in your head and then aloud will make this exercise more focused and active. Keep the self talk going for two straight minutes. Watch the recording, and take notes of what you observe. Record the exercise again, but this time mirroring your every move and word from your first round.
Upload the most recent recording to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of this recording as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective.
Respond to the recording of two other classmates. (200-250 words)
Readings/Reflection
The approach to all the readings and reflections will be fairly universal. Once again, the instructor should evaluate the writing based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity.
This chapter defends a practice that often seems artificial and inorganic on stage and screen: talking to oneself.
However, like anything, this action only seems phony when it is particularly amplified or contrived for effect. Also, talking to oneself on stage/screen is often the sign of lazy writing when a character launches into a tirade whose sole purpose is to provide exposition. When performed organically, self talk can be a useful tool for an actor.
The responses here require some introspection in addition to references to the text, asking the students to recall these times they verbalize to themselves and analyze what made them do so in the first place.
Video
The video for this update models an acting exercise where an actress talks to herself in character as she searches for cats while also agonizing over the mess they have made. This features footage of Uta Hagen herself actively explaining this concept to a student.
Much like the Meisner technique video from the Update #1, this video asks students to denote both the organic and contrived moments in the exercise. This will help students realize what actions they should try to avoid and identify the kind of moments that work for this type of exercise. Modeling is in a way a form of mimesis because it portrays a template that can be followed beat by beat at first until the piece evolves into something more unique.
Scene Work
This activity provides a point of focus as the student is tasked with actively making a list. This also incorporates mimesis as it tasks the student to repeat a performance that started as improvisational and organic. For formal productions, actors must be able to recreate moments and continue to make them appear and feel organic, even if they are contrived in reality. This also allows the actor to trust that the physicality of the moment will trigger the inner life of a character once the initial blocking has been set.
If the student uploads both of these recordings, they then can be compared and contrasted to identify anything lost or gained from the initial exercise to the encore.
The instructor and peer reviewers should be constantly looking for these small nuances and details in these recordings, especially since there will be closer shots of students’ faces and the luxury of recording that can be paused and rewound.
Readings/Reflection
Read the chapter “I. Creative Experience“ from Improvisation for the Actor by Viola Spolin
https://archive.org/details/improvisationfor0000spol_l6g0/page/2/mode/2up?view=theater
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions (250 words per answer):
Video
Watch the Video:
"Theatre Game #11 XL- Alan Sells Apples In Albania." From Drama Menu - drama games & ideas for drama.
In a Google Doc or MS Word Doc, respond to to this chapter using the following questions:
For further reference, watch the video below demonstrating how the game is executed in person.
Scene Work
Much like the card game solitaire, develop your own theater game that can be played by just one person at a time.
Record yourself explaining the rules of this game and then demonstrating it. Then, explain how this game could be amended to include TWO people. Let a classmate enter your Zoom room, and demonstrate the game.
Upload this recording to the message board. Include your own metacognition (250 words) of this recording as text in the same post. Watch them, and reflect on what you observe from this outside perspective.
Respond to the recording of two other classmates. (200-250 words)
Readings/Reflection
The approach to all the readings and reflections will be fairly universal. Once again, the instructor should evaluate the writing based on completeness, thoughtfulness, and specificity.
This chapter is a more formally written informative text that discusses the necessity of games, teamwork, and working with an audience. In the reflection questions, students should focus most on adaptability and how they can utilize these tenets by themselves in their own insular bubble. This kind of reflection can lead directly into the Scene Work that tasks them to create their own solitary theatre game.
Video/Response
There is a specific way that this activity can be adapted into a solo activity: an actor can look at a random letter generator, whether it is on their phone or with flash cards. They then can give a new answer with each successive letter, timing themselves to keep on pace. For example, they might flash to a “G” and say “Greg sells Grapes in Greenland” then quickly flash to J and say “John sells jam in Johannesburg.” This maintains the quick thinking, under pressure element of the game without someone randomly pointing at the actor.
However, this A solution, but not THE solution. The instructor could offer this solution if a student is stubborn and insistent that there is no way to amend the theatre game. The instructor should be open to whatever amendments the student suggests. That being said, these amendments should be feasible and within the purview of an average middle class person. For example, generating hologram AI’s to join the student in a circle would NOT be feasible nor within the average student’s purview.
Scene Work
This update requires the student to develop TWO self sufficient theater games. However, the original game will be reverse engineered to include multiple people.
This will give students the opportunity to flex their skills as a practitioner or director as they will need to explain their process both to the audience of the video and to their partner from class.
Instructors should evaluate this scene work based on the originality of their idea, the clarity in which they explain and demonstrate it, and how useful the game will be in their development as actors.
Complete the class evaluation at the link below:
Acting 101: Course Evaluation
https://forms.gle/AyNFQ6217X5ouEcN9
These surveys will be completed anonymously, so your complete transparency and discretion is appreciate
Acting 101 (Asynchronous) Class Evaluation
How rewarding were the solitary asynchronous elements of this class?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding
How rewarding were any projects involving partners, groups, peer review, etc?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding
How satisfactory was the feedback you received from your instructor on assignments and projects?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding
How satisfactory was the feedback you received from your peers on assignments and projects?
Not Rewarding at All 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Rewarding
Was this remote/asynchronous class model an adequate substitute for the synchronous, face-to-face model?
Would you prefer more or less group/partner activities?
Did acting exclusively on Zoom/Teams feel limiting?