Poster Session
Artificial Intelligence and Collaborative Platforms: Promoting an Inclusive Learning Environment View Digital Media
Poster Session Jennifer Lanham, Garreth Smith
As educators in social work, we are responsible for creating a learning environment that is inclusive, supportive, and safe for all students. This is a crucial aspect of social work education, and one way to achieve this goal is by integrating cutting-edge technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI), into our curriculum. By utilizing innovative tools, AI technology can assist in creating collaborative learning experiences that encourage students to work together on projects. This promotes inclusivity by providing diverse perspectives and fostering a sense of community among students, ultimately leading to a sense of belonging for all students, regardless of their unique needs. Integrating AI technology with collaborative learning platforms can significantly improve the quality of education and promote community, inclusivity, and well-being. This approach can cater to diverse learning needs and create a sense of belonging for all students. However, it is essential to note that such technology must be integrated thoughtfully, with a focus on pedagogy and ongoing teacher-student engagement. With this in mind, educators can create a truly inclusive and supportive learning environment that empowers all students to succeed. In summary, embracing AI technology can be a valuable asset in social work pedagogy. As social work educators, we are responsible for using these tools to enhance the quality of education we provide. Ultimately, AI technology and collaborative learning platforms can be powerful allies in social work pedagogy, transforming it by promoting a more inclusive and supportive learning environment for all students.
Electronic Service to Defendants Overseas in Civil Proceedings View Digital Media
Poster Session Yafei Xue
In transnational litigation, the permissibility of electronic service methods, such as email or social media, is a common issue in U.S. law. The primary treaty governing this issue is the Hague Service Convention. When the convention was signed, email had not yet been introduced, leaving the treaty silent on whether email service is allowed. Two key provisions of the Hague Service Convention are relevant: Article 10(a), which governs service by postal mail, and Article 19, which addresses methods of service prescribed by the internal laws of the destination country. Unfortunately, U.S. federal courts remain divided on whether email service is permitted under the Hague Service Convention, with conflicting case law further complicating the matter. This lack of uniformity and clarity has created confusion for practitioners and challenges in securing the appearance of defendants in U.S. federal courts. This study argues that: (1) federal courts should unify in ruling that email service is permissible under the Hague Service Convention; (2) Article 19 allows service methods prescribed by the destination country's internal law, which could include email; and (3) service by social media may serve as a suitable alternative to email service in certain cases.
