Abstract
This paper presents a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of two podcast interviews: one featuring Princeton University President Christopher Eisgruber and the other featuring conservative activist Christopher Rufo. Each articulates opposing perspectives on federal funding, academic freedom, and ideological influence in U.S. higher education. Using Fairclough’s CDA framework and theoretical contributions from Foucault, Fraser, Dewey, Mead, and constructivist scholarship, the analysis examines how both figures deploy language to assert power, define legitimacy, and shape public perception. The study evaluates the fallacies and contradictions embedded in both narratives and proposes a centrist, ethically grounded synthesis. Finally, the paper offers pragmatic, forward-looking recommendations for universities responding to shifting political, legal, and social pressures as of April 2025.
Presenters
Heidi MannetterAssociate Professor of Practice | MBA Program Director | PhD Candidate, Zimpleman College of Business, Drake University, Iowa, United States
Details
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation in a Themed Session
Theme
KEYWORDS
Critical Discourse Analysis, NYT Media Discourse, Academic Freedom, Higher Education
