New Learning MOOC’s Updates

Marcos Jr., Basic Education Report 2024

Source:
Speech of President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. during the Basic Education Report 2024. January 25, 2024. Official transcript.


Key Quotes / Excerpts:

“We must subject ourselves to tougher diagnostic tools so we can use the results to make lesson plans that will help us meet our greatest obligation to our youth, to our people: to mold them into critical thinkers, into problem solvers, and brave visionaries and to ensure that they wield the skills that will allow them to succeed in the future.”

“A learner with books on the table, a well-trained, highly-motivated, well-paid teacher in front of them, teaching a curriculum carefully curated to their needs. At sa gitna nito, ang sentro ng ating pagsisikap: Isang batang natututo.” (“…At the center of our efforts: A child who is learning.”)


Commentary / Analysis:
This speech is a good example of political rhetoric that appeals to ideals, as it attempts to outline what education should achieve and what the government ought to prioritize.

Substance in the rhetoric:

  • Commitment to diagnostic tools and evidence-based planning. The president doesn’t simply say “education matters,” he talks about using diagnostics to inform lesson plans. That shows attention to measurement, feedback loops, and tailoring instruction to learners. This is more substantial than rhetoric that only insists that education is important.
  • Centering the learner. By describing concrete conditions — such as “books on the table,” teacher motivation and pay, and a curriculum tailored to needs — Pres. Marcos is highlighting the supports that are necessary for learning. It acknowledges that learning doesn’t happen in a vacuum; it requires physical resources, teacher welfare, and a valid curriculum.
  • Skill formation for the future. The emphasis on molding learners into “critical thinkers, problem solvers, and brave visionaries” sets social objectives: not only literacy/basic skills, but higher-order thinking, innovation, and agency. This aligns with modern global education goals (21st-century skills, preparing for an uncertain future).

Limits/areas of vagueness:

  • Lack of detail about implementation. While the speech mentions “tougher diagnostic tools” and “well-trained, well-paid teachers,” it does not specify which diagnostic tools, timelines, benchmarks, or funding levels are being referred to in these excerpts. Without that, the statements risk being aspirational more than policy commitments.
  • Ambiguity in the burden of responsibility. The rhetoric positions the government as responsible (which is appropriate), but in such speeches, the roles of local governments, communities, schools, or teachers are often less clearly defined in terms of accountability, capacity, or constraints. For example, identifying where “gaps” exist is one thing; ensuring that all districts, including those in remote or under-resourced areas, can meet those needs is more challenging.
  • Possible mismatch between ambition and resource constraints. The vision is high: critical thinking, curating curriculum, ensuring high teacher pay, etc. However, the success of these initiatives depends heavily on budget, human resources, logistics (including training and supervision), infrastructure (such as classrooms, books, and learning materials), and other factors. If these are underfunded or poorly managed, the rhetoric may remain just that.

Implications for social objectives of education:
From this speech, the following social objectives emerge:

  • Equity & access: by implying that all learners deserve resources (books, good teachers, curricula adjusted to needs).
  • Quality: not just measurable learning outcomes but deeper learning (critical thinking, problem solving).
  • Learner-centered education: placing the child at the center.
  • Teacher support: paying and training teachers well (which is essential but often neglected in rhetoric).
  • Future orientation: preparing learners for future challenges, not only the current curriculum or rote knowledge.

Conclusion:
I believe President Marcos Jr.’s message is inspiring because it recognizes learners and teachers as the heart of education. However, for these goals to be truly meaningful, the government must follow through with concrete actions and sustained support so that the vision of quality and equitable education does not remain only in words.


Source: Presidential Communications Office. (2024, January 25). Speech of Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. during the Basic Education Report 2024. Retrieved from https://pco.gov.ph/presidential-speech/speech-of-ferdinand-r-marcos-jr-during-the-basic-education-report-2024/