Assessment for Learning MOOC’s Updates
Assumptions Behind Different Assessment Types
Standardized Tests
- Operate on the belief that everyone’s knowledge can be measured in the same way
- Seem fair in theory but often disadvantage students with fewer resources
- The “objective” results reflect only part of student learning
Formative Assessments
- Focus on providing regular feedback to guide student growth
- Work well when feedback is clear and consistent, helping students make steady progress
- Vague or inconsistent feedback can leave students uncertain about how to improve
Performance-Based Assessments
- Built on the idea that students show true understanding through real-world tasks
- Can make learning more meaningful and motivating
- Lack of clear criteria can introduce subjectivity and personal bias in grading
Portfolios
- Based on the belief that a body of work over time gives a fuller picture of student abilities
- Encourage students to take ownership of their learning
- Can be overwhelming for students without proper guidance or structure
Peer Assessment
- Assumes students can fairly evaluate each other’s work and benefit from the process
- Can foster community and shared responsibility when done well
- Risks bias and unfairness if students don’t know how to give constructive feedback
Impact of Assumptions
- These underlying beliefs directly influence how assessments function in the classroom
- When teachers recognize and address these assumptions, assessments become more effective and equitable for all students

