Buenas tardes, cordial saludo en parte comparto su punto de vista, pero de mi modo debe, el aprendizaje debe ser mixto tanto presencial como virtual para que se tenga los dos enfoques y haya una mejor socialización e integración del estudiante.

• Juan Miranda

En mi experiencia docente, he observado que la dinámica del aprendizaje suele reflejar una combinación de mímesis, síntesis y reflexividad. P. ej. en un curso de economía, los estudiantes inicialmente imitan (mímesis) modelos y conceptos básicos presentados en clase, reproduciondo fórmulas y definiciones. Sin embargo, a medida que avanzan, se les invita a sintetizar información diversam integrando teorías y datos para construir su propio entendimiento crítico. Finalmente, mediante actividades de discusión y análisis de casos realres, los alumnos desarrolla reflexividad, cuestionando las aplicaciones y limitaciones de los modelos en contextos sociales y econ´micos concretos. Esta combinación favorece un aprendizaje promoviendo así un conocimiento significativo y autónomo.
What do you think about it? @Louren Almeniana,@Almas Shoaib,

• Julio César Granados Muñoz

A curriculum practice that integrates mimesis, synthesis, and reflectivity fosters a layered and dynamic learning environment. Mimesis, or imitation, allows learners to engage with models of expert thinking or behavior—such as replicating artistic styles, scientific methods, or rhetorical structures—laying the groundwork for foundational understanding. As students progress, synthesis becomes critical: they begin to merge ideas across disciplines, perspectives, or experiences, constructing original insights and demonstrating higher-order thinking. Reflectivity acts as the connective tissue, prompting learners to critically assess their processes, decisions, and outcomes. Together, these elements create a holistic educational experience where learners not only acquire and apply knowledge but also internalize and evaluate their learning journey. This interplay supports both intellectual growth and personal development, aligning with deeper aims of transformative education.

• Louren Almeniana

Reflexivity: New Learning
In the context of new learning, reflexivity has become a central skill for both educators and learners. It involves a conscious examination of one's own beliefs, practices, and learning processes, enabling continuous growth and adaptation. As traditional, one-directional teaching models give way to more collaborative and learner-centered approaches, reflexivity empowers individuals to question assumptions, respond to diverse perspectives, and actively shape their educational experiences. For teachers, this means not only guiding students but also reflecting on their own roles and evolving in response to the dynamic needs of modern classrooms.

• Almas Shoaib

Reflexivity: New Learning
In the context of new learning, reflexivity has become a central skill for both educators and learners. It involves a conscious examination of one's own beliefs, practices, and learning processes, enabling continuous growth and adaptation. As traditional, one-directional teaching models give way to more collaborative and learner-centered approaches, reflexivity empowers individuals to question assumptions, respond to diverse perspectives, and actively shape their educational experiences. For teachers, this means not only guiding students but also reflecting on their own roles and evolving in response to the dynamic needs of modern classrooms.

• Almas Shoaib

Title: Reflexivity in Education: Coaxing Learners to Think for Themselves
Reflexive learning is a cornerstone of transformative education, where learners are encouraged to actively construct their own knowledge and critically engage with their learning environment. As highlighted in Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, this approach emphasizes the importance of scaffolding—guiding students to achieve goals just beyond their current abilities through collaboration and reflection.

One practical application of reflexive learning can be seen in the Reggio Emilia approach, which prioritizes student agency and exploration. This method encourages learners to ask questions, investigate topics of interest, and construct meaning in ways that are deeply personal and connected to their experiences.

Another compelling insight comes from the principle of “coaxing learners to think for themselves.” This idea stresses that education should not merely be about delivering knowledge but about helping students develop the tools to critically analyze and engage with the world around them. For example, Cazden’s concept of pedagogical weaving underscores the importance of connecting diverse perspectives and experiences to create a richer, more inclusive educational process.

However, reflexivity demands a shift in traditional power dynamics within classrooms. Teachers become facilitators rather than authority figures, and students are required to take on greater responsibility for their learning. While this can be challenging to implement, especially in standardized systems, the long-term benefits for critical thinking and problem-solving are immense.

How can we expand reflexive learning approaches to broader educational systems while balancing the need for structure and standardization?

• Souad Atigi

The ‘Learning by Design’ paradigm gives a compelling, multifaceted approach to information acquisition by stressing experiencing, conceptualizing, analyzing, and applying. It blends both constructivist and critical educational ideas, fostering an active and reflective engagement with learning rather than a passive intake of knowledge.
The concept understands that learning is not a singular, linear process but comprises numerous methods of knowing. By distinguishing between experiencing the known and experiencing the new, it values learners’ existing knowledge while systematically extending their understanding. This guarantees equity in education, as it respects varied backgrounds and cognitive paths.
The journey from experiencing to conceptualizing guarantees that students anchor abstract notions in living events. The emphasis on conceptualizing by naming and conceptualizing with theory stimulates critical and creative thinking, helping students progress beyond rote memorization to a more sophisticated comprehension of knowledge systems.
The framework’s inclusion of evaluating critically underlines its alignment with transformative education, enabling students to examine power structures, social prejudices, and dominant narratives. This critical engagement helps learners become conscious agents of change, encouraging both intellectual autonomy and social responsibility.
The implementing phase guarantees that learning is not confined to theoretical conversations but extends to real-world action and creativity. The contrast between applying appropriately and applying creatively pushes learners beyond basic duplication of knowledge, fostering ingenuity, adaptation, and problem-solving.

• Najia Hichmine

Comment on Stand-Out Idea

One standout idea from the readings is Bruner’s Theory of Instruction, which emphasizes the importance of scaffolding in learning. This concept encourages educators to provide support that enables students to build on their existing knowledge and gradually tackle more complex concepts. Bruner’s insights highlight the necessity of engaging students actively in their learning process and fostering a deep understanding rather than rote memorization. I’m curious how others see scaffolding applied in their educational contexts. @Name, what are your thoughts on the practical application of Bruner’s ideas in your teaching or learning experiences?

Update on Dynamics of Learning in Curriculum Practice

In analyzing the dynamics of learning within a curriculum practice that reflects mimesis, synthesis, and reflectivity, it becomes evident how these concepts interact to enhance the educational experience.

Mimesis in this context emphasizes the imitation of existing knowledge and cultural practices. For instance, in a curriculum focused on literary analysis, students might engage in close reading of classical texts, emulating the analytical frameworks established by Aristotle or Confucius. This approach allows learners to internalize established norms and values before they are encouraged to move beyond them.

Synthesis is evident when educators, like Froebel, incorporate play as a primary mode of learning. By integrating play into the curriculum, students synthesize their experiences, knowledge, and social interactions, creating a more holistic understanding of the material. This method also mirrors Thayer’s idea of making curriculum relevant by connecting students’ interests with academic content. The synthesis of these elements allows learners to see the practical application of their knowledge in real-world contexts.

Reflectivity plays a critical role in encouraging students to think critically about their learning processes. As seen in Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development, educators can facilitate reflective learning by guiding students through challenging tasks with the right amount of support. Cazden's concept of pedagogical weaving also underscores the importance of integrating different teaching strategies to address various learning styles and promote deeper understanding. When students engage in reflexive learning, they are not only absorbing knowledge but also assessing their approaches and adjusting their strategies, leading to a more personalized and effective learning experience.

• Flore Gilbuena

A common concept in discussions about teaching models is the concept of culturally responsive teaching (CRT). This approach emphasizes the importance of acknowledging and appreciating students' cultural backgrounds in the learning process. By integrating students' cultural contexts into the curriculum and promoting an inclusive classroom environment. Educators can increase student participation and promote a sense of belonging with CRT, encouraging teachers to build strong relationships with students. Make learning more relevant and meaningful How do you think using culturally responsive learning can impact student success and classroom dynamics?

• Michael Asis

odels of pedagogy and patterns of curriculum are essential frameworks that shape the educational experience by determining how knowledge is delivered and how learning is structured.

1. Pedagogical Models:

Traditional Pedagogy: Often teacher-centered, this model focuses on direct instruction, where the teacher transmits knowledge, and students are passive recipients. It emphasizes memorization and mastery of specific content, which is assessed through standardized testing.

Constructivist Pedagogy: In contrast, this model is student-centered and encourages active learning. It posits that learners construct their own understanding through experiences and reflection. Teachers serve as facilitators, guiding inquiry and promoting critical thinking. This aligns with approaches like project-based learning and problem-solving models.

Collaborative Pedagogy: This model fosters group work and interaction, emphasizing that learning is a social process. It encourages cooperation among students to solve problems and create shared understanding, helping to develop communication and teamwork skills.



2. Curriculum Patterns:

Subject-Centered Curriculum: This traditional approach focuses on dividing knowledge into discrete subjects, like math, science, and history, with little integration between them. Its strength is in-depth mastery of each discipline, but it can sometimes lead to fragmented learning experiences.

Interdisciplinary Curriculum: This model integrates multiple subjects around a common theme or problem, helping students to see connections between disciplines. It encourages holistic learning, where knowledge from different areas informs a comprehensive understanding of a topic.

Experiential Curriculum: Based on Dewey’s philosophy of learning by doing, this curriculum is designed around hands-on activities, real-world projects, and problem-solving. It aligns closely with constructivist pedagogy, as students learn through direct engagement with their environment and reflect on their experiences.




Both pedagogy and curriculum interact to influence how students engage with content, develop skills, and prepare for future challenges. The challenge for educators is to balance different models to create inclusive and transformative learning environments that not only impart knowledge but also foster critical thinking, creativity, and social responsibility.

• Ella Lane Garchitorena