According to Skinner, free will isn't as real as we usually believe it to be. Rather, training, reinforcement, and the environment all influence human behavior. Thus, in contrast to independent, conscious choices, Skinner argues that what seems to be free will is actually the product of intricate external factors.

B.F. Skinner makes contentious and thought-provoking remarks regarding free will. His claim that free choice is a myth calls into question long-held notions of human responsibility and autonomy. Important problems concerning the nature of personal agency are brought up by Skinner's behaviorist viewpoint, which emphasizes that conditioning and environmental influences determine all human acts.

On the one hand, Skinner's theories emphasize how strongly outside factors, such reinforcement and prior experiences, may mold human behavior. What we frequently consider to be "free" decisions may actually be responses to training, as his work in operant conditioning showed that behavior could be systematically controlled and adjusted through rewards and punishments. This viewpoint can be helpful, particularly in disciplines like psychology, education, and therapy where promoting positive change requires an awareness of how the environment influences behavior.

Skinner's rejection of free will, however, has drawn a lot of criticism. Critics contend that by disregarding subjective sensations, emotions, and internal cognitive processes, it oversimplifies human behavior. Many people think that moral responsibility, self-reflection, and decision-making are human abilities that transcend environmental training. Although Skinner's theories are useful for elucidating specific behavioral patterns, they can come across as reductionist since they fall short in addressing the complexity of human cognition, creativity, and free will.

Skinner's remarks force us to reevaluate what freedom and accountability really mean. Do we have the capacity to make our own decisions, or are we completely influenced by outside factors? In the continuous conflict between determinism and free will in psychology, philosophy, and ethics, his viewpoint is an essential component.