Assessment in Secondary School in Blended Learning

Work thumb

Views: 27

  • Title: Assessment in Secondary School in Blended Learning: Do Assessment Training Activities Help Formative Assessment Practices?
  • Author(s): Laia Lluch Molins , Elena Cano
  • Publisher: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Collection: Common Ground Research Networks
  • Series: The Learner
  • Journal Title: The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation
  • Keywords: Assessment For Learning, Assessment Literacy, Online Assessment Practices, Teacher Training, Digital Technologies, Teachers
  • Volume: 32
  • Issue: 2
  • Date: July 25, 2025
  • ISSN: 2327-7920 (Print)
  • ISSN: 2327-8692 (Online)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v32i02/169-192
  • Citation: Lluch Molins, Laia, and Elena Cano. 2025. "Assessment in Secondary School in Blended Learning: Do Assessment Training Activities Help Formative Assessment Practices?." The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation 32 (2): 169-192. doi:10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v32i02/169-192.
  • Extent: 24 pages

All Rights Reserved

Copyright © 2025, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved

Abstract

This study was conducted on the purposes and features of assessment supported by digital technologies in secondary education during the COVID-19 period in Catalonia (Spain), based on data collected through 274 questionnaires completed by teachers. The results show, on the one hand, an intention to improve, which is closely aligned with assessment for learning, and suggest a connection to teachers’ assessment literacy, while, on the other hand, the main feature of good assessment practice was the possibility of using it for providing feedback. Teachers who had assessment training before the lockdown seem closer to strategies of formative assessment than those who completed their training during the pandemic. According to 42% of the respondents, the primary reason why online assessment practices have not been sustained over time is the lack of adequate training. Finally, digital tools seem to be aligned with their assessment conception. Those who are close to accountability purposes seem to use digital tools for keeping and managing data (82.2%). These findings highlight both the potential and the limitations of technology-supported assessment and underscore the need for more pedagogically grounded professional development. The implications of assessment practices are outlined.