Assessment for Learning MOOC’s Updates
Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), run by the OECD.
What it is:
PISA tests 15-year-old students worldwide every three years in reading, mathematics, and science. Rather than rote memorization, it focuses on applying knowledge to real-life contexts.
Strengths:
International comparability: Provides data for policymakers across many countries.
Focus on application: Goes beyond knowledge recall to measure critical thinking and problem-solving.
Policy impact: Helps identify strengths and weaknesses in national education systems.
Large scale & rigorous: Uses representative samples and standardized administration.
Weaknesses:
Cultural bias: Test design may favor certain educational traditions or languages.
Narrow scope: Focuses on reading, math, and science, leaving out arts, social skills, and creativity.
High stakes: Countries may overemphasize rankings, leading to “teaching to the test.”
Context limitations: Socioeconomic and cultural factors affecting results aren’t always captured fully.
Outline for a Proposed Educational Evaluation
Title: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in University English Courses
Purpose
To assess whether PBL improves students’ English speaking and critical thinking skills compared to traditional lecture-based instruction.
Participants
Two groups of second-year university students: one in a PBL-based course, one in a traditional course.
Methods of Data Collection
Pre- and post-tests on speaking fluency and accuracy.
Surveys on student motivation and engagement.
Observation checklists during class activities.
Portfolio assessment of final projects.
Criteria for Success
Improvement in speaking test scores.
Higher levels of self-reported confidence and engagement.
Evidence of collaboration and critical thinking in projects.
Strengths of this Design
Mixed-methods approach (quantitative + qualitative data).
Practical focus on both outcomes and process.
Directly relevant to classroom practice and improvement.
Potential Limitations
Small sample size may affect generalizability.
Teacher differences (skill in managing PBL) could influence results.
Self-reported surveys may be biased.