Adam P Rusch
William Cope
Jason Berg.png "Rita van Haren")
Rita van Haren
Eric Patnoudes
Maura Rodgers Brand
Jason Williams
Melanie Lamus
Heather A Ochman
May Thet Khine Nyeine-Learning Ecologies MOOC’s Updates
Collaborative Intelligence - Social Dimensions of Learning
Collaborative Intelligence—where, for instance, peers offer structured feedback to each other, available knowledge resources are diverse and open, and the contributions of peers and sources to knowledge formation are documented and transparent. This builds soft skills of collaboration and negotiation necessary for complex, diverse world. It focuses on learning as social activity rather than learning as individual memory.
Comment: Make a comment below this update about the ways in which educational technologies can support collaborative intelligence. Respond to others' comments with @name.
Post an Update: Make an update introducing a collaborative intelligence concept on the community page. Define the concept and provide at least one example of the concept in practice. Be sure to add links or other references, and images or other media to illustrate your point. If possible, select a concept that nobody has addressed yet so we get a well-balanced view of collaborative intelligence. Also, comment on at least three or four updates by other participants. Collaborative intelligence concepts might include:
- Distributed intelligence
- Crowdsourcing
- Collective intelligence
- Situated cognition
- Peer-to-peer learning
- Communities of practice
- Socratic dialogue
- Community and collaboration tools
- Wikis
- Blogs
- Suggest a concept in need of definition!
The concept of Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) is a revolutionary approach to assessment that customizes the test experience in real-time to match the individual ability level of the test taker.
Here are the core components and concepts:
1. Tailored Assessment
* The Basic Idea: Unlike traditional fixed-form tests where everyone answers the same set of questions, CAT uses a computer algorithm to select and administer test items (questions) that are individually matched to the test-taker's current estimated ability. It's often called tailored testing.
* How it Works: The test usually begins with an item of moderate difficulty.
* If the test-taker answers correctly, the next item selected will be more difficult.
* If the test-taker answers incorrectly, the next item selected will be easier.
* This continuous process of evaluation and item selection allows the test to quickly converge on the examinee's true ability level.
2. Efficiency and Precision
* Fewer Items: By constantly adjusting difficulty, CAT avoids wasting the test-taker's time on questions that are either trivially easy or frustratingly difficult. This allows it to achieve the same or higher level of measurement precision with significantly fewer items (sometimes 50% fewer) than a traditional test.
* Time Saving: Fewer items translate directly to a shorter test duration.
* Increased Precision: The items administered are the most informative—those that are a good match for the test-taker's estimated ability—leading to a more accurate and reliable score.
3. Key Technical Foundations
* Item Bank: A large pool of pre-calibrated test questions, each with established difficulty and discrimination parameters.
* Item Response Theory (IRT): The statistical framework essential for CAT. IRT allows the algorithm to:
* Estimate the test-taker's ability level after each response.
* Select the most optimal item from the bank (the one that provides the maximum information for the current ability estimate) to administer next. The ideal item is often one the test-taker is estimated to have a 50% chance of answering correctly.
* Termination Criteria: The algorithm continues adapting until a pre-determined condition is met, such as:
* A minimum number of items have been administered.
* The estimate of the test-taker's ability has reached a high level of precision (i.e., the standard error of measurement is sufficiently small).
4. Benefits
* Motivation: The test-taker is consistently challenged at an appropriate level, which can make the experience more engaging and less frustrating.
* Security: Because each test-taker receives a different set of items, the chances of item exposure and cheating are dramatically reduced.
* Personalization: The assessment experience is entirely individualized, providing a unique measure of each person's standing on the ability scale.
* Immediate Results: Scoring can often be computed instantly upon test completion.
To summarise that, CAT is an adaptive, data-driven assessment method that uses an algorithm and an item bank, grounded in Item Response Theory, to personalize the difficulty of the test in real-time. Its primary goal is to maximize the accuracy of the ability estimate while minimizing the number of questions administered.
In today’s learning environments, collaborative intelligence emphasizes the idea that knowledge is best constructed not in isolation but through interaction, dialogue, and the pooling of diverse perspectives. One powerful form of collaborative intelligence is Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Learning, where learners act as both teachers and students, exchanging expertise, feedback, and insights in reciprocal ways.
Defining the Concept:
Peer-to-peer learning is an instructional strategy in which learners engage in structured collaboration, often teaching one another and co-constructing knowledge. Unlike hierarchical teacher–student models, this approach positions everyone as a contributor to the knowledge-making process. According to Boud, Cohen, and Sampson (2014), P2P learning helps learners develop both subject mastery and essential soft skills such as communication, empathy, and critical thinking.
Example in Practice:
A practical example of peer-to-peer learning can be seen in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where participants engage in peer review of assignments. In Coursera, for instance, learners upload essays or projects and then review others’ work using rubrics. This not only deepens understanding of the subject but also encourages self-reflection as learners compare their work to peers. Beyond MOOCs, platforms like GitHub (for coding collaboration) or Wikipedia (for collaborative knowledge construction) exemplify peer-to-peer knowledge-building on a global scale.
Peer-to-peer learning is particularly effective in addressing complex problems that benefit from multiple perspectives. For example, in group research projects, each student may bring unique cultural, academic, or professional insights, which together form a more comprehensive understanding of the topic than any individual could achieve.
Why It Matters:
In the context of the e-Learning Ecologies MOOC, P2P learning represents a shift from passive consumption of content to active participation in knowledge networks. It democratizes learning, nurtures agency, and fosters communities of practice that persist beyond the classroom.
�� For a deeper exploration, see:
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Link
In today’s learning environments, collaborative intelligence emphasizes the idea that knowledge is best constructed not in isolation but through interaction, dialogue, and the pooling of diverse perspectives. One powerful form of collaborative intelligence is Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Learning, where learners act as both teachers and students, exchanging expertise, feedback, and insights in reciprocal ways.
Defining the Concept:
Peer-to-peer learning is an instructional strategy in which learners engage in structured collaboration, often teaching one another and co-constructing knowledge. Unlike hierarchical teacher–student models, this approach positions everyone as a contributor to the knowledge-making process. According to Boud, Cohen, and Sampson (2014), P2P learning helps learners develop both subject mastery and essential soft skills such as communication, empathy, and critical thinking.
Example in Practice:
A practical example of peer-to-peer learning can be seen in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where participants engage in peer review of assignments. In Coursera, for instance, learners upload essays or projects and then review others’ work using rubrics. This not only deepens understanding of the subject but also encourages self-reflection as learners compare their work to peers. Beyond MOOCs, platforms like GitHub (for coding collaboration) or Wikipedia (for collaborative knowledge construction) exemplify peer-to-peer knowledge-building on a global scale.
Peer-to-peer learning is particularly effective in addressing complex problems that benefit from multiple perspectives. For example, in group research projects, each student may bring unique cultural, academic, or professional insights, which together form a more comprehensive understanding of the topic than any individual could achieve.
Why It Matters:
In the context of the e-Learning Ecologies MOOC, P2P learning represents a shift from passive consumption of content to active participation in knowledge networks. It democratizes learning, nurtures agency, and fosters communities of practice that persist beyond the classroom.
�� For a deeper exploration, see:
Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2014). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from and with Each Other.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Link
One emerging concept in recursive feedback is learning analytics. Learning analytics refers to the collection, measurement, and analysis of student data to understand and optimize the learning process (Siemens & Long, 2011). Unlike traditional feedback methods that rely mainly on teacher evaluations, learning analytics uses digital traces left by students in online platforms—such as time spent on tasks, quiz results, discussion participation, and resource usage—to provide real-time insights.
The recursive aspect of learning analytics lies in its continuous feedback loop. Data is captured as learners interact with digital platforms, analyzed to identify trends or challenges, and then used to provide feedback to both students and instructors. This allows learners to reflect on their performance while teachers can adjust instructional strategies based on evidence rather than assumptions.
A practical example of learning analytics in action is the use of dashboards in Learning Management Systems (LMS) like Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. These dashboards display data such as progress bars, grades, and activity logs, giving students a clear picture of their learning journey. Instructors can also use this data to identify at-risk students who may need additional support or to recognize high-performing students who may benefit from advanced challenges.
Another example is Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where platforms like Coursera or edX rely heavily on analytics to track learner engagement, predict dropout risks, and suggest personalized learning pathways. In this sense, analytics not only supports individual learning but also informs instructional design at a larger scale.
In conclusion, learning analytics is a powerful recursive feedback tool because it makes the learning process more transparent, adaptive, and data-driven. By transforming raw data into actionable insights, it fosters self-regulated learning for students and evidence-based teaching for educators, ultimately improving learning outcomes.
One emerging concept in recursive feedback is learning analytics. Learning analytics refers to the collection, measurement, and analysis of student data to understand and optimize the learning process (Siemens & Long, 2011). Unlike traditional feedback methods that rely mainly on teacher evaluations, learning analytics uses digital traces left by students in online platforms—such as time spent on tasks, quiz results, discussion participation, and resource usage—to provide real-time insights.
The recursive aspect of learning analytics lies in its continuous feedback loop. Data is captured as learners interact with digital platforms, analyzed to identify trends or challenges, and then used to provide feedback to both students and instructors. This allows learners to reflect on their performance while teachers can adjust instructional strategies based on evidence rather than assumptions.
A practical example of learning analytics in action is the use of dashboards in Learning Management Systems (LMS) like Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. These dashboards display data such as progress bars, grades, and activity logs, giving students a clear picture of their learning journey. Instructors can also use this data to identify at-risk students who may need additional support or to recognize high-performing students who may benefit from advanced challenges.
Another example is Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where platforms like Coursera or edX rely heavily on analytics to track learner engagement, predict dropout risks, and suggest personalized learning pathways. In this sense, analytics not only supports individual learning but also informs instructional design at a larger scale.
In conclusion, learning analytics is a powerful recursive feedback tool because it makes the learning process more transparent, adaptive, and data-driven. By transforming raw data into actionable insights, it fosters self-regulated learning for students and evidence-based teaching for educators, ultimately improving learning outcomes.
One emerging concept in recursive feedback is learning analytics. Learning analytics refers to the collection, measurement, and analysis of student data to understand and optimize the learning process (Siemens & Long, 2011). Unlike traditional feedback methods that rely mainly on teacher evaluations, learning analytics uses digital traces left by students in online platforms—such as time spent on tasks, quiz results, discussion participation, and resource usage—to provide real-time insights.
The recursive aspect of learning analytics lies in its continuous feedback loop. Data is captured as learners interact with digital platforms, analyzed to identify trends or challenges, and then used to provide feedback to both students and instructors. This allows learners to reflect on their performance while teachers can adjust instructional strategies based on evidence rather than assumptions.
A practical example of learning analytics in action is the use of dashboards in Learning Management Systems (LMS) like Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. These dashboards display data such as progress bars, grades, and activity logs, giving students a clear picture of their learning journey. Instructors can also use this data to identify at-risk students who may need additional support or to recognize high-performing students who may benefit from advanced challenges.
Another example is Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where platforms like Coursera or edX rely heavily on analytics to track learner engagement, predict dropout risks, and suggest personalized learning pathways. In this sense, analytics not only supports individual learning but also informs instructional design at a larger scale.
In conclusion, learning analytics is a powerful recursive feedback tool because it makes the learning process more transparent, adaptive, and data-driven. By transforming raw data into actionable insights, it fosters self-regulated learning for students and evidence-based teaching for educators, ultimately improving learning outcomes.
One emerging concept in recursive feedback is learning analytics. Learning analytics refers to the collection, measurement, and analysis of student data to understand and optimize the learning process (Siemens & Long, 2011). Unlike traditional feedback methods that rely mainly on teacher evaluations, learning analytics uses digital traces left by students in online platforms—such as time spent on tasks, quiz results, discussion participation, and resource usage—to provide real-time insights.
The recursive aspect of learning analytics lies in its continuous feedback loop. Data is captured as learners interact with digital platforms, analyzed to identify trends or challenges, and then used to provide feedback to both students and instructors. This allows learners to reflect on their performance while teachers can adjust instructional strategies based on evidence rather than assumptions.
A practical example of learning analytics in action is the use of dashboards in Learning Management Systems (LMS) like Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. These dashboards display data such as progress bars, grades, and activity logs, giving students a clear picture of their learning journey. Instructors can also use this data to identify at-risk students who may need additional support or to recognize high-performing students who may benefit from advanced challenges.
Another example is Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where platforms like Coursera or edX rely heavily on analytics to track learner engagement, predict dropout risks, and suggest personalized learning pathways. In this sense, analytics not only supports individual learning but also informs instructional design at a larger scale.
In conclusion, learning analytics is a powerful recursive feedback tool because it makes the learning process more transparent, adaptive, and data-driven. By transforming raw data into actionable insights, it fosters self-regulated learning for students and evidence-based teaching for educators, ultimately improving learning outcomes.
One emerging concept in recursive feedback is learning analytics. Learning analytics refers to the collection, measurement, and analysis of student data to understand and optimize the learning process (Siemens & Long, 2011). Unlike traditional feedback methods that rely mainly on teacher evaluations, learning analytics uses digital traces left by students in online platforms—such as time spent on tasks, quiz results, discussion participation, and resource usage—to provide real-time insights.
The recursive aspect of learning analytics lies in its continuous feedback loop. Data is captured as learners interact with digital platforms, analyzed to identify trends or challenges, and then used to provide feedback to both students and instructors. This allows learners to reflect on their performance while teachers can adjust instructional strategies based on evidence rather than assumptions.
A practical example of learning analytics in action is the use of dashboards in Learning Management Systems (LMS) like Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. These dashboards display data such as progress bars, grades, and activity logs, giving students a clear picture of their learning journey. Instructors can also use this data to identify at-risk students who may need additional support or to recognize high-performing students who may benefit from advanced challenges.
Another example is Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), where platforms like Coursera or edX rely heavily on analytics to track learner engagement, predict dropout risks, and suggest personalized learning pathways. In this sense, analytics not only supports individual learning but also informs instructional design at a larger scale.
In conclusion, learning analytics is a powerful recursive feedback tool because it makes the learning process more transparent, adaptive, and data-driven. By transforming raw data into actionable insights, it fosters self-regulated learning for students and evidence-based teaching for educators, ultimately improving learning outcomes.
El tema de la inteligencia colaborativa en relación con las evaluaciones basadas en el rendimiento resulta sumamente relevante para entender cómo medir el aprendizaje en contextos educativos contemporáneos. Estas evaluaciones, a diferencia de los exámenes tradicionales, buscan valorar no solo el conocimiento declarativo, sino también la aplicación práctica de habilidades, la resolución de problemas y la capacidad de trabajo en equipo. En este marco, el éxito y el fracaso no deben interpretarse únicamente como resultados finales, sino como parte de un proceso formativo que revela el nivel de competencia alcanzado por los estudiantes.
Uno de los grandes aciertos de este enfoque es que permite evidenciar la transferencia del conocimiento a situaciones reales o simuladas. Por ejemplo, un proyecto de ingeniería, una práctica clínica o la elaboración de un plan de negocios son escenarios donde los estudiantes deben integrar lo aprendido y aplicarlo en contextos auténticos. Esto ofrece un panorama más justo y completo que un examen escrito, pues reconoce el valor de las habilidades colaborativas, la creatividad y la toma de decisiones.
Sin embargo, también existen riesgos y fracasos asociados. A veces, las evaluaciones basadas en el rendimiento pueden carecer de criterios claros, lo que genera subjetividad en la valoración. Además, en contextos de trabajo colaborativo, puede aparecer el “efecto polizón”, donde algunos estudiantes se benefician del esfuerzo de otros sin aportar de manera equitativa. Esto plantea la necesidad de diseñar instrumentos de evaluación más rigurosos y transparentes, que incluyan tanto la dimensión individual como la colectiva.
En el marco de la inteligencia colaborativa, el éxito no solo se mide por el producto final, sino por la calidad de las interacciones y la capacidad del grupo para aprender de los errores. Incluso un “fracaso” en el resultado puede transformarse en un logro si genera reflexión crítica y retroalimentación constructiva. De este modo, la evaluación se convierte en una oportunidad de crecimiento, más que en un veredicto definitivo.
En conclusión, el verdadero desafío de las evaluaciones basadas en el rendimiento está en equilibrar la objetividad de los criterios con la riqueza de la experiencia colaborativa, entendiendo el éxito y el fracaso como partes esenciales de un aprendizaje profundo y significativo.
Las dimensiones sociales del aprendizaje hacen referencia a los aspectos del proceso educativo que implican interacción, colaboración y construcción colectiva del conocimiento. Estas dimensiones reconocen que aprender no es un acto aislado, sino un fenómeno profundamente influenciado por las relaciones entre estudiantes, docentes y el entorno educativo. El aprendizaje social enfatiza la importancia del contexto, la comunicación y la cooperación, entendiendo que los conocimientos se construyen de manera más efectiva cuando se comparten y negocian con otros.
Una de las bases de las dimensiones sociales es la interacción entre pares, que permite a los estudiantes discutir ideas, resolver problemas de manera conjunta y reflexionar sobre distintos puntos de vista. El trabajo en grupo, los proyectos colaborativos y las discusiones guiadas son ejemplos de estrategias que fomentan este tipo de interacción, promoviendo habilidades sociales como la empatía, la negociación y la escucha activa. Además, estas experiencias fortalecen la motivación, pues los estudiantes se sienten parte de una comunidad de aprendizaje en la que sus aportes son valorados.
Otra dimensión relevante es la relación con el docente, quien actúa como facilitador, guía y mediador del conocimiento. La retroalimentación constante, la orientación en procesos colaborativos y la creación de un ambiente inclusivo son fundamentales para que la dimensión social del aprendizaje tenga éxito. El docente no solo transmite información, sino que también promueve la construcción compartida del conocimiento, estimulando el pensamiento crítico y la participación activa.
Finalmente, las dimensiones sociales incluyen la participación en comunidades de aprendizaje más amplias, como foros, redes educativas y entornos virtuales, donde los estudiantes pueden interactuar con personas de diferentes contextos, enriqueciéndose con diversas perspectivas. En conjunto, estas dimensiones aseguran que el aprendizaje sea no solo cognitivo, sino también social, ético y colaborativo, preparando a los estudiantes para desenvolverse efectivamente en la sociedad y en entornos profesionales.