The SONA's focus on substantial financial investment in education is commendable, reflecting a recognition of the sector's importance in national development. However, the address has been critiqued for presenting a narrow view of education. Critics argue that the emphasis is predominantly on education as a means to economic ends, particularly job preparation, rather than as a foundation for democratic engagement and critical thinking. This technocratic perspective may overlook the broader social and civic roles that education plays in fostering an informed and participatory citizenry.

Furthermore, while the budget allocation is significant, questions remain about the effective utilization of these funds. There is a need for transparency and accountability in how the resources are distributed and whether they reach the intended beneficiaries, such as underfunded schools and marginalized communities. Without clear mechanisms for monitoring and evaluation, the risk exists that financial investments may not translate into tangible improvements in educational outcomes.

In summary, while the 2025 SONA underscores the government's financial commitment to education, it falls short in articulating a comprehensive vision that encompasses the social, civic, and democratic purposes of education. A more holistic approach would involve not only investing in educational infrastructure but also fostering an environment where education empowers individuals to engage critically and meaningfully in society.